Articles

A new book explains why Betty Friedan might have paved the way for equal marriages by blowing the roof off the feminine mystique.

I got together with my friend Stephanie Coontz the other day to talk about her new book, A Strange Stirring: The Feminine Mystique and American Women at the Dawn of the 1960s (Basic Books), which has drawn rave reviews from The New York Times Book Review, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and a host of other publications. Stephanie is the country's foremost expert on marriage--she wrote the 2005 bestseller Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage--as well as a frequent…

This wonderful new book explains why, despite some of the weaknesses in Betty Friedan's myth-busting classic of the 1950s, it stirred up women of all classes and helped to change the world.

Photo By Karen Moskowitz On February 4, 1997, when English au pair Louise Woodward fractured the skull of her 8-month-old charge, Matthew Eappen causing his death five days later she unleashed a storm of outrage. One of the targets was Deborah Eappen, the child's mother, who had returned to work as an ophthalmologist (albeit part time) after her son's birth.

In your introduction, you wrote that the book still draws visceral reactions fifty years after its publication. Why?The book was such a giant bestseller in its day, and the title conjured up such vivid images, that people who have never read the book--feminists and anti-feminists alike--often attribute their own assumptions about the womens movement to Friedan. Anti-feminists claim that Friedan espoused self-interested careerism and hated men, neither of which is true. Feminists sometimes…

I am a young professor of sociology teaching classes on gender, marriage and social change -- and I have never read Betty Friedan's "The Feminine Mystique." Like many women of my generation, I thought I had. I must have, I told myself. Perhaps in college? No. And it turns out that very few of my well-educated, feminist-leaning friends have either.